Is the universe deterministic ? 2/2
In the first part of this article (see Is the universe deterministic ? 1/2), we saw that the universe is always determining itself. My purpose here is to illustrate the quantum communication underlying this concept through my personal experience.
Until December 19, 2013 at 11:30 p.m., the formation, development and rupture of the aneurysm located in my brain (read My Story) completely escaped my consciousness. But if this information remained unconscious from my point of view, the fact remains that from the point of view of the universe it was :
- encoded in the space-memory field (see the article What is space-time ?)
- available from their point of origin, and throughout their evolution.
Information, from the unconscious to the conscious
As soon as the information « aneurysm in formation » began to be encoded, two scenarios became possible : whether it ruptures or not. In the interval between the genesis and the rupture of the aneurysm, as everything that was encoded about the state of my meninges remained inaccessible to my consciousness, the aneurysm was in a state of quantum superposition. It was both broken and intact. In other words, its condition was undetermined. And the circumstances in which it finally ruptured remained undetermined until my cognition met the appropriate situation for the conditions of the rupture. Namely : a context, a place, a timing…
When the sentinel headaches appeared on December 17, the boundary between the information about the aneurysm rupture I was unconsciously carrying and my own field of consciousness began to be much more permeable, it is worth saying … Just as this information began to make its way into the consciousness of my loved ones. A quantum communication was at work.
To some extent, this warning sign, among others, helped to determine the circumstances of the accident. Indeed, it is very likely that Lena and James « captured » this information – because of our proximity, our strong « entanglement » – between the moment the harbinger appeared and the moment of the actual break-up. This would explain why my daughter exceptionally did not take a nap that afternoon, and why my companion exceptionally decided, at the last minute and for no apparent reason, to come by public transport rather than by scooter.
Information goes through the heart
In fact, it all happened as if they had predicted an event of emotional significance and meaning to them. This is not remembered from the studies conducted by Rollin Mc Craty at the Heartmath Institute (see article on Quantum Biology). Their heart, and then their brain, accessed the risk to my health through the quantum field of information, and their bodies responded by behaving in an unusual way. I would add that this unconscious quantum communication suggests that these events are of the order of synchronicity, I’ll come back to that.
By the time the aneurysm collapsed, its condition was determined. But as everything is constantly in motion in the information feedback loop, a new equation, with two unknowns, surfaced : was I going to stay alive – and if so in what state – or leave ? An equation with a result that was still undetermined as long as it was possible to reverse the trend towards the best possible scenario.
Information passes through the quantum vacuum
The reason I can argue that this trend was reversible is because of the information I had access to through Madeleine. The information of the aneurysm rupture remained at an unconscious level for me until a doctor gave it to me. But this same information came into Madeleine’s consciousness long before, when I called her. For her, the indetermination as to the state of the aneurysm was lifted at that point… the bleeding spontaneously stopped, but a new indetermination took place immediately as my benefactor perceived the risk of recurrence.
Having this information and the ability to consciously encode it at the quantum level, she was able to make it available to people who could help me. Everything happened as if she had said to herself, « I feel like there’s a bleeding, an emergency. I am sending this information into the quantum vacuum, if it is just the feedback that will reach Gaetana and myself through someone or something in the physical universe will be the confirmation of that ». In other words, quantum communication has gone 5/5 ! Confirmation came from James, who had a hunch of a stroke and insisted on calling the fire department. It found confirmation with the firefighters themselves who did not hesitate to transport me to the emergency room despite a relatively small number of apparent symptoms.
Quantum communication : encoding and decoding
With the conscious
If the encoding of information occurs whether we are aware of it or not, the same applies to the decoding of information, the other side of the feedback loop. This decoding, if it is conscious and controlled, will considerably reduce the time it takes to obtain the information. On the other hand, if it is unconscious, the decoded information that will manifest itself in the concrete world may never reach our consciousness.
The encoding of information creates deterministic conditions, but these remain undetermined as long as the information is not related to a concrete world situation. Our influence on future situations is all the greater as we are able – in conscience – to decode the information at our disposal and encode others.
That’s the art of a person like Madeleine. Her work consists of letting an element of the unconscious emerge, decoding it, and then integrating it into the consciousness. It’s quantum communication ! Madeleine decodes information encoded in the unconscious mind so that the person carrying the information becomes aware of it, if it can be useful to her. Then eventually it encodes other information, guided by respect, wisdom and discernment.
With the informed vacuum
But how does she do it ? Water specialist Marc Henry  enlightens us :
« It must be understood that (…) the so-called energetic medicines (…) work with informed emptiness (…). Those who claim that these medicines have no scientific basis simply do not make the effort to take into account the existence of quantum and topological effects in their thinking . » 
When I called Madeleine on the evening of December 19, for example, she connected, via the quantum weft of space-time, directly to the space-time coordinates I was at. This gave her access to information about the aneurysm and she knew immediately what was happening. Arriving at the emergency room, the information given directly by my body confirmed his diagnosis. They also gave her other indications, such as the fact that the bleeding, which had been stopped initially, was recurring.
She then changed the information at the quantum level so that another situation would occur in the real world, namely the second hemorrhage would stop and the medical situation would be stabilized. Although this may seem irrational or even magical, it is only an application of unified field theory. In other words, it is purely and simply a matter of physics.
With the unconscious
I should point out that Madeleine acted only with my consent. She didn’t ask me the question directly, it wouldn’t have made much sense because at the time I wasn’t at all aware of what was at stake for me. Once again, she consciously used quantum communication. She has, in her own words, « talked with [my] soul ». The somewhat sudden use of the word « soul » may in turn seem esoteric and even misplaced. However, once again, this concept finds a very simple explanation if we link it to the theory of the connected universe : our soul represents our individual memory, which feeds the field of universal memory. It contains all the information that was once encoded in our experience. So she has a lot more information than our ego. And as such, she sometimes has a different agenda…!
I can’t say if that’s why the « conversation » between Madeleine and my soul lasted the equivalent of my waiting time in the emergency room, i.e. 2h30. All I can say is that the « emergency » information was made available to both doctors and firefighters but, unlike firefighters, doctors did not use it quickly. That’s why I tend to think that my soul needed that time to decide what to do.
The proper use of disclosure
The art of discernment
If Madeleine has access to more information than I do, one might legitimately wonder why she didn’t warn me of the existence or even possible rupture of the aneurysm before that famous night. The most immediate answer I can give is that she does not have access to all the information .
And among those at her disposal, she must discern what is useful to guide the person and what is likely to short-circuit her experience. In other words, she’s a tightrope walker. In order not to fall off, it has to transmit certain information – which is not always the information that keeps us in our comfort zone, far from it – without falling into interference.
When I met her, she was literally practicing this art of wisdom and discernment. She was giving her care sitting on an unstable stool, something that intrigued me a lot. Such a contrast between the stability she embodied and her stool left me perplexed. One day I told her of my astonishment and of the fact that she was taking the risk of finding herself sitting on the floor at any moment. To which she replied that she liked to work with this stool because its fragility reminded her of the posture of balance that she had to constantly keep in mind. That day, I was given an extra lesson !
Having access to information is one thing, having the wisdom to disclose it or not, and how to do so, are others. Madeleine did end up changing stools without changing her line of conduct. Rather, it was as if, over time, she had completely incorporated this outside help.
Ignorance has its good sides
Getting back to the information of a potential stroke risk, even if she had given it to me, what would I have done with it ? Would I have gone to the E.R. for the slightest bit of a headache ? Perhaps a more relevant question would be : Would the conditions of my experience have been the same if I had been aware of this information ? Would I have had an experience of expanding consciousness ?
I’m rather inclined to doubt it. For if I had had the information, my mind would have immediately appropriated it. But my experience was based on the one hand on the fact that he surrendered to his own inability to understand what was happening. And on the other hand, on the choice I had to make – to continue my experience on this Earth or not – a choice that only my access to the presence really made possible. Without the element of surprise that comes from the lack of information, none of this would have happened.
In the end, everything went the best way possible for me based on the information available at the time. Thus, not having this information allowed me to experience an altered state of consciousness. While benefiting from Madeleine’s presence. I would add that I was really on the razor’s edge that night : if I had chosen to « leave » at some point, she would also have been there by my side, she simply would have accompanied me differently.
Synchronicity, the connection point
Madeleine navigates in a reality much richer in information than mine. In fact, I should say she has access to more information than I do. And if I were to name the link between our two planes of experience, the term synchronicity would seem appropriate. Because when synchronicity manifests itself, everything happens as if we were receiving « infusions » from the universal connection plane where infinitely more information is encoded than what we usually have. It’s as if some part of the universal quantum communication is reaching our consciousness. These glimpses would then « awaken our consciousness » to the possibility that a much larger reality than the one we experience on a daily basis exists.
If the subject of synchronicity interests you, I invite you to continue your reading with the articles in the series Chance or synchronicity ? (on line soon)
Notes and references
 Marc Henry is an engineer, associate researcher at the CNRS, director of the solid-state molecular chemistry laboratory and professor of inorganic chemistry at the University of Strasbourg (France).
 « The topological approach reasons in terms of neighborhood (…) You just have to forget the shape and size and, if the thing remains identical to itself, [you are] in the presence of a topological effect (…) [An] example of topological structure : vortexes. Whether it is a tornado, water, syphon or galaxy, the phenomenon is independent of the dimensions of the material structure » according to Marc Henry, (November 10, 2014), quoted by Myriam Gablier, L’eau, passeuse de conscience, In : INREES — Inexploré, p.58